Every child has a right to learn and belong in their classroom, but state data reveals that right is denied to disabled students

The data reveals a systemic failure – Queensland schools are suspending students with disability at alarming rates and it’s getting worse. Our discipline systems need input from the families most affected by them.

From existing economic cost analysis, we know that managing suspensions wastes $20 million annually, while families are losing $14 million in income. That’s money that could create inclusive classrooms across Queensland instead of funding exclusion.

Matilda Alexander, CEO of Queensland Advocacy for Inclusion says, “The Disability Royal Commission has recommended suspensions as a last resort. The Queensland Government also includes suspension as a last resort in the Principal guidelines for student discipline. But this data tells a very different story.”

Alexander reinforces “Disabled students are roughly 25% of the student cohort, but in term 2 this year, they made up 64% of suspended students in QLD – the highest it has been in the last 12 months.”

Two vertical bar graphs side by side. Graph on left is Qld State School Enrolments 2025. Disabled students were 25 percent, with 144,756 enrolments. Non-disabled students were 75 percent, with 423,050 enrolments. Graph on right is Qld State School Suspensions Term 2 2025. Disabled students accounted for 64 percent, with 11,913 suspensions. Non-disabled students accounted for 36 percent, with 6,669 suspensions. Disabled students are shown in orange. Non-disabled students are shown in purple

Picture this: it’s 10 am on Monday, and instead of learning alongside their friends, disabled students across QLD are sitting at home – again. Their parents are choosing between keeping their jobs and caring for suspended children. This isn’t about ‘problematic’ students – it’s about poorly resourced systems that don’t accommodate diverse learning needs.

Students with disability and their families need to be included in the policies that disproportionately impact them. These families are the experts in their own needs, yet schools suspend first and ask questions later.

When young people are pushed out of education, one broken system leads to another, with taxpayers covering between $5-10 million yearly in youth justice system expenses. We need principals in all schools to put inclusion first and suspension as an absolute last resort. All students have a right to learn.

The Disability Royal Commission was clear: suspension must become a last resort. But right now, for disabled students, it’s often the first one. We need a complete system redesign with disabled students and families leading the way —not tweaking around the edges. When schools create inclusive environments designed by and with disabled students, all students benefit from stronger learning communities, and we stop this pipeline from classroom to courtroom.

Our Federal Disability Discrimination Act (the Act) is currently under review and there is an opportunity to protect our children’s right to learn. The Act should require our education authorities to avoid the use of exclusionary discipline on students with disability. Unless it is necessary as a last resort to avert the risk of serious harm to the student, other students, or staff.

Alexander responds, “However, 64% of suspended students being those with disability, would suggest there are not enough inclusive supports in our schools to avoid this ultimatum. The question isn’t whether we can afford to change —it’s whether we can afford not to.”

Media inquiries:
Queensland Advocacy for Inclusion

Phone: 07 3844 4200
Email: qai@qai.org.au

Endorsed by the A Right to Learn campaign members

Logos for Youth Advocacy Centre, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Legal Service and Peak Care

References

Data provided by the Queensland Government in response to a question on notice regarding number of School Disciplinary Absences (SDA).

Table 1 Number of school disciplinary absence incidents, by type for all students.
Short Suspensions Term 3 2024 were 16,466, Term 4 2024 were 16,464, Term 1 2025 were 15,789, Term 2 2025 were 17,995. Long Suspensions Term 3 2024 were 599, Term 4 2024 were 598, Term 1 2025 were 496, Term 2 2025 were 587. Exclusions Term 3 2024 were 418, Term 4 2024 were 338, Term 1 2025 were 412, Term 2 2025 were 424. Cancellations Term 3 2024 were 231, Term 4 2024 were 226, Term 1 2025 were 145, Term 2 2025 were 215. Total incidents Term 3 2024 were 17,714, Term 4 2024 were 17,626, Term 1 2025 were 16,842, Term 2 2025 were 19,221. Table 2 Number of school disciplinary absence incidents, by type for NCCD disabled students. Short Suspensions Term 3 2024 were 10,065, Term 4 2024 were 9,684, Term 1 2025 were 9,563, Term 2 2025 were 11,577. Long Suspensions Term 3 2024 were 329, Term 4 2024 were 325, Term 1 2025 were 242, Term 2 2025 were 336. Exclusions Term 3 2024 were 239, Term 4 2024 were 205, Term 1 2025 were 131, Term 2 2025 were 104. Cancellations Term 3 2024 were 55, Term 4 2024 were 106, Term 1 2025 were 4, Term 2 2025 were 3. Total incidents Term 3 2024 were 10,688, Term 4 2024 were 10,320, Term 1 2025 were 9,940, Term 2 2025 were 12,020. Note Data for 2025 is preliminary and is subject to change until full year data is finalised.